Sulzer Ltd (OTCPK:SULZF) Q2 2023 Earnings Conference Call July 25, 2023 4:00 AM ET
Company Participants
Domenico Truncellito – Group Head of External Communications
Suzanne Thoma – Executive Chairwoman
Thomas Zickler – Chief Financial Officer
Conference Call Participants
Patrick Rafaisz – UBS
Arben Hasanaj – Vontobel
Christian Arnold – Stifel Schweiz AG
Alessandro Foletti – Octavian
Michael Roost – Baader-Helvea
Operator
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Sulzer’s H1 Results 2023 Conference Call. I am Ali, the Chorus Call operator. I would like to remind you that all participants will be in listen-only mode, and the conference is being recorded. The presentation will be followed by Q&A session. [Operator Instructions]
At this time, it’s my pleasure to hand over to Domenico Truncellito, Group Head of External Communications. Please go ahead, sir.
Domenico Truncellito
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you very much for being with us today, and welcome to Sulzer’s H1 results call, which we are hosting as a live webcast. You can find the media report and the presentation on our website. As mentioned, at the end of the presentation, you’ll have the opportunity to ask questions. To do that, please call the number that was on your invitation or on the press release.
With me today is Suzanne Thoma, our Executive Chairwoman; and Thomas Zickler, our CFO.
Without further delay, I’d like to hand over to Suzanne, please.
Suzanne Thoma
Thank you very much. Domenico, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to our mid-year results presentation. Thank you very much for being with us and for your interest in our company. We are able today to communicate good half-year results. You see here on the slide, in a summary, we continue robust, a good performance in all our businesses. We see continued increase in growth in all divisions, and we see a substantial increase in sales, which is also due to a better performance in sales execution during this first semester of 2023.
Also, you will see substantial increase in our profit. That has several reasons. One is due to our improved execution, our first signs of improving in operational performance. We see a strong cash improvement. We have put a lot of effort on cash management in the last six months, which you can see in increased receivables, I mean, increased collection of the receivables and also more customer advances for large projects. As a result of all of this, we are able to increase our full-year guidance, which I will speak about after Thomas Zickler, our CFO, has given you more details in our figures.
So ladies and gentlemen, we are happy to report 24.1% increase in orders, 15.4% increase in sales and an improving operational profitability up to 10.1%. And Finally, I would like to note that our new businesses, which are strictly in the renewables area have continued to grow and start to be a significant part of our business.
Now I hand over to Thomas. Thomas, please go ahead.
Thomas Zickler
Thank you very much, Suzanne. And also a wonderful good morning from my side. As already mentioned by Suzanne, we have had a really solid H1 and — hold on, sorry for this. We have had really a solid H1, where you can see that our order intake rose by 24.1% and to just close to CHF2 billion in the first six months of this year. We had here a strong momentum across all our end markets. We also have achieved by higher volumes, a higher order intake gross margin of 20 basis points to now 33% for the first six months of this year.
And this, despite — and you will hear later about this, that we have a higher share of energy orders, which normally come with a lower margin in. We also have on the sales side, a plus of 15.4%, compared to H1 last year. This is based on a solid order backlog execution. When we talk about sales and you see the nominal numbers, in Swiss franc, you don’t expect that we were hit by an FX impact on the sales side of CHF106 million and on the order intake, we would have been CHF136 million higher than you can see here in the Swiss franc nominal number.
When we talk about operational profitability for the group, you see that our profitability has increased by 110 basis points. This was mainly because of higher volumes and margins and a better mix.
Now let me come to the divisions. First is Flow equipment. We have here a rise in order intake in sales and in profitability. We have an order intake, a plus of 25.1%, up to CHF825 million. We have here Energy up with 84% water, more or less flat and industry, the same. In industry, we have seen a consolidation at a high level, especially in the pulp and paper business.
When it comes to sales, you see that we are 14.1% higher, and this is on a strong growth in water. In water, we are 19.5% better than in H1 last year. And in industry, we are 18.4% better than in last year. In energy, we are only 4.7% better this is because of the lead times in the energy business, which is normally between six and 18 months. And you will see then the impact of the higher order intake from energy coming in by late this year, but mostly in 2024.
Talking about operational profitability. You see here that in flow equipment, the operational profitability rose by 170 basis points or to a profitability of 7.0%. This is because of a strict cost discipline and many operational improvements as also based on a higher utilization of our existing capacities.
Let’s go to the Services division. In the Services division, the main message is that we have a pickup in growth across the board. So you see orders up 22.1% and to CHF663 million. We have double-digit growth in EMEA and in Americas, in Americas with 34% and in EMEA with 20 — 14%, sorry. We also have, in APAC, a slight decrease, but this is mainly due to a large order which we received in H1 last year and this year, in the first six months, we were not able to compensate for this large order, which we have received last year. But otherwise, the business in APAC is running well. Coming to sales.
On sales, you see that we have 11.3% plus, compared to last year, up to CHF558 million. This is driven by all regions and with growth rates between 10% and 12%. The operational profitability in services went up by 90 basis points to 14.2%, and this is based on the increased volumes and a better mix on the products and services.
Let’s come to our star to Chemtech, our division where we have growth across all the businesses and also a continued focus on the renewables. We have on the order side an order intake plus of 25.3% to the first time in the first six months of above CHF0.5 billion to CHF505 million. We also have a continued very strong growth in our renewables business. You see it on the slide with plus 79%. This is in absolute numbers nowadays CHF89 million or 17.6% of the order intake of Chemtech. And this compares with 15.4%, which we saw by end of last year from the renewables.
On the sales side, we have 24.3% plus to CHF381 million, and this is based on the solid order backlog execution and the orders, which we had as of end of last year. The profitability is up by 180 basis points, so almost 2 percentage points — sorry, 2 percentage. This is because of pricing discipline in key markets and our product mix.
Now going to the overall result of this good movement in all the divisions we have the profitability up in all divisions and also the volumes. And we have seen the effects of our operational improvements across the board. With this, you see that our EBIT this year for the first six months is adding up to CHF151 million. And when you remember last year, we had in the first six months, the one-offs for Russia and Poland, which amounted for EBIT of CHF133 million, which we had to write-off.
And if you take this one-time impact out of last year’s EBIT for the first six months, which we have done in the gray bar, which you see on the EBIT with CHF107 million, you see that by our, say, operations and our improvements and our volume growth on the sales side, we have improved EBIT by 41.6%.
When we do the same comparison for net income, excluding the impacts for Russia and Poland, you see that net income has even increased further to 48.6%. This is mainly — this additional increase is mainly because of additional impacts on our effective tax rate, where we achieved some tax savings and also a changed interest rate situation where we had smaller impacts from positive interest on our net income.
Now coming to my last slide, talking about free cash flow. You see that our free cash flow is significantly, up compared to last year. We have created a free cash flow of CHF107 million in the first six months of this year, compared to minus CHF78 million last year. This is a free cash flow change, compared to last year of plus CHF185 million. This is caused mainly by our higher profitability, our operational improvements, our strong cash conversion on higher net income, and also our improved collections on receivables, as well as down payments from our higher order intake.
With this, I would like to hand back to Suzanne to then start with the new guidance.
Suzanne Thoma
Based on these very good developments in our company and also in the markets that we are serving, we are able to improve our full-year guidance. You see the summer here. We are now guiding for order intake growth between 10% and 14%. That is, of course, organic, and it is also adjusted for FX. We are guiding for a sales increase, growth of up between 11% and 13%, again, organic and FX adjusted, and we are striving to have an operational profitability of around 11%. So these are good developments in our company, which are based on interesting developments in our markets and also the results of our efforts to improve our operations and to improve our business excellence.
So if we look at the strategic perspective, very high level in our company. We can say that our strategic development has two major pillars at this point in time. Pillar number one is to realize the growth potential that we see in our current market and going forward in adjacent markets. Our company is active in market which are really relevant for the future.
One point is energy security, which is of importance, as we all know, but also energy efficiency sustainability in the sense of reducing our ecological footprint as a society and in our customer industries, and in general, the trend to tighter regulations when it comes to purity, expectations or affluent reductions of water consumption. So we see a situation where both our new products and technologies, but also our established products and technologies can grow due to the size of our markets and the shifts in the markets that we can observe.
The second pillar, and this is an important element of the strategy is business and operational excellence throughout our value chain. There is still a lot of potential in so to for improvement, both on the side of our margin on our commercial side and on the way we handle our operations and we manage our cash. We have made nice progress, but we still have quite a long way to go.
We do have tailwinds on not the least, because of our strong Sulzer brand that is known around the globe, and that is seen as a guarantee or at least an expectation for high quality and a solid way of managing the business. This helps us in these rather turbulent times in our markets that are undergoing transformation. Of course, it is very important in our duty that we can uphold the meaning of this Sulzer brand that is giving us such good advantages in our markets.
So let’s have just a short close look, many things I have already mentioned. As I said, we have attractive long-term strategic growth perspectives in the markets that we are present, because the markets have are large, at least a certain size, and they are growing and they are transforming. And the transformation in those markets which you can put under the headline of becoming more sustainable or reducing the ecological footprint or living up to increasing or tightening regulations is going in our direction. Our divisions do have multiple leadership positions in their markets, normally not over the entire market, but in defined segments of the market. And that is what we want to concentrate on — these markets are still large for a company like Sulzer. And we clearly see that we have opportunities in our core business and in adjacencies in markets that have a relation to our core business, but are an extension. You will hear more of that later in the year.
Based on all that and the fun fundament for realizing this rather good potential that we have from the market size from the market is our operational and our business excellence. We have to focus really on value creation with continued this start this in the last six months and on customer satisfaction. Customers want good quality and normally, they want it fast and without complications. It is necessary that we can further reduce our net working capital to implement our strategy and to finance our strategy.
And as I have mentioned, it is also about protecting our brand that is such a great asset for us in the global market. Our base is that the company should be resilient and that we do take risks, but these risks will be reasonable risk that we can take without jeopardizing the company is another fundamental block of our strategy going forward.
Yes, I come to the end also of my part of the presentation, the takeaway for you are we do have continued strong growth in our businesses and the markets that we are serving are undergoing a transformation and that transformation leads to a higher potential normally for our company. We see margin expansion in all divisions, notably in flow equipment, which has a 7% margin, which is, I believe, a very long time ago that we had such a high margin.
But we also see margin expansion in Chemtech. Sulzer is well positioned in interesting and relevant markets, and these markets are undergoing a transformation that is, kind of, going in our direction in the area of energy, of sustainability of ecological footprint reduction, water management, increasing purity, expectation, tightening regulations across the globe. We do see robust growth in new markets like bio-based polymers, or recycling. Bio-based polymers have been around for a very long time. Sulzer has been doing research on it for a long time, and we do now see up take in this area with concrete and large customer orders.
We also have a very interesting carbon capture technology that has been developed in the past in Sulzer that we continue to develop now, and we do see large orders coming in slowly but clearly taking up and being implemented in the market. Last but not least, or rather a fundamental of what we are doing is operational and commercial excellence. We still have quite some way to do there, but we had a good start in the first-half of this year, and we will continue our efforts also in this area as a base for the implementation of our future strategy.
Last but not least, we do have a strong balance sheet, which is a base for profitable growth and also reflects that we want to be a resilient company. Thank you very much for your attention. We now have the opportunity for questions. I’m asking in the direction of the session management, if there are any questions?
Question-and-Answer Session
Operator
We will now begin the question-and-session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Patrick Rafaisz with UBS. Please go ahead.
Patrick Rafaisz
Thank you and good morning, everyone. I have two, maybe three questions. The first one is on non-operation items in — especially in flow and the services division. Can you add some color on where these were coming from? And should we expect more of that in the second-half of the year?
Thomas Zickler
Maybe let me answer this question first. So when we come to non-operational items for flow here, we have just a couple of hundred thousand this year. And these are basically, kind of, adjustments related to capacity and personnel adjustments, but this is — has nothing to do with maybe what you have in mind with restructuring. It’s just optimization of the capacity.
Suzanne Thoma
Your second question or maybe a follow-up on the first question.
Patrick Rafaisz
Okay, good. Yes, yes. No, I just as a follow-up, yes. I mean I see here for flow, nonoperational items of minus CHF5 million and then for services, I see plus CHF14 million in the bridge in the segment information for the division?
Thomas Zickler
Yes. This is what we can do off-line, because this is something — this is out of the cash flow statement, isn’t it?
Patrick Rafaisz
So the segment information, Footnote 3.
Thomas Zickler
In the segment information here…
Patrick Rafaisz
Where you bridge down from operating EBITDA to EBIT.
Thomas Zickler
I’m very sorry. I come back to you related to this question, because currently, I cannot…
Patrick Rafaisz
We can follow-up it’s fine.
Thomas Zickler
Yes, yes, yes.
Patrick Rafaisz
That’s good, we can follow-up on that yes of course. Good, and then the second question, services, very strong growth in the first-half of the year. And I’m just wondering to what extent is this, to a certain extent, still pent-up demand that is now being worked down from delayed maintenance or repair work? Or should we assume that we are reaching new run rate here for the services division.
Thomas Zickler
It’s more the latter one. We are reaching here more run rates because the demand is basically coming from more retrofits and repair work. Yes, part of it was delayed last year, because of the high energy prices. You know this — and then they let everything run through, but it’s really a new run rate, which we see in the services business, which also reflects then, in the end, the higher volume and the higher sales.
Suzanne Thoma
Retrofits are a good example of what I was mentioning about the tighter regulations with retrofits. You can extend the lifetime of existing equipment, including enable this equipment to reach the higher regulations regarding affluent and so on. So we do see a certain transition in the service business towards this type of business, which, of course, helps the development in the Service division.
Patrick Rafaisz
Okay. I understand. Thank you. And then the last one would be on operational excellence. Can you already give us a sneak preview of how much potential you see here to improve the operational excellence and how that compares to let’s say, the mix benefit you had. You mentioned positive mix effects in I think Services and Chemtech. Can you quantify that? And is operational excellence on top of that going forward?
Suzanne Thoma
We have only the first results of our operational excellence efforts. So the improvement that you see in cash comes mostly from better collections, which, of course, is an aspect of business excellent. I would not like to give you a number at this point in time, but it is on top, and it is on top of the mix impact, and it is, I would say, substantial particularly also in utilization, but also cost.
Patrick Rafaisz
Okay, good. Thank you very much.
Thomas Zickler
Yes, and maybe to add to your first question, what came to my mind after reflecting your question, it can very well be that we have the last bookings out of our closure of the Portland factory and this is then booked into flow and partly in services. But let me check and come back to you.
Patrick Rafaisz
Okay, thank you. Thank you.
Operator
The next question comes from the line of Arben Hasanaj with Vontobel. Please go ahead.
Arben Hasanaj
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. I would have one question around your order guidance. So if you look at the second-half year, your higher order guidance would imply actually at the midpoint, maybe flat organic growth or even slightly negative. So can you explain a bit how — yes, how you are thinking about the second half year? Is this based on your pipeline? Or is this more an expression of caution. If you can comment on that, please.
Suzanne Thoma
We have had, of course, a very strong first semester when it comes to order intake, particularly also in the Flow Equipment division with large orders also in Chemtech with very large orders, that we cannot expect that they will be repeated in the second semester. Then of course, the economy is still a little bit not exactly a question mark, but we want to be on the cautious side. And so we decided for this order intake also based on the divisional input, of course. So it’s a mix of a very good H1 and a certain caution on our side.
Arben Hasanaj
Thank you.
Operator
The next question comes from the line of Christian Arnold with Stifel Schweiz AG. Please go ahead.
Christian Arnold
Yes, good morning. On flow equipment, I was quite surprised by your comment that you see especially higher margin potential for flow equipment going forward. So looking at H1 performance, you increased your margin by 7% — to 7%. I think that’s a level we have seen the last time in 2015. And you were also benefiting, I think, currently from a very positive mix effect. So water and industry outperforming the energy end market. And we know the energy pumps usually have lower margins than modern industry.
Now looking at your order intake of plus 84% in energy, that means that your product mix will be clearly less favorable going forward. And you still want to increase your margins over proportional in flow equipment. So can you help me here?
Suzanne Thoma
Yes, gladly. You are absolutely right. You have an over proportional order intake in energy that will — that — these orders will be mostly executed then next year. That will give some pressure on our sales margin coming from energy, but we expect that we can correct for that with the good development in other areas that we see coming with much higher margins. When we speak of energy, we are not speaking of BU Energy alone. It is the sales that we have into the area of energy, and that is also sales that we have in the Service division is also part of the sales that we have in Chemtech, for example, for renewable fuels that we are strongly in. So I was then speaking about the increasing importance of energy, not about the B energy per se, but about the market around surrounding energy and energy efficiency.
Christian Arnold
You’re mentioning — you mentioned that you have other areas with very attractive margins going forward. So what can then in ‘24, what can which markets are you thinking of which can potentially compensate for the negative product mix?
Suzanne Thoma
Yes, we see, going forward, an increase in water and in industry, we see clearly a strong growth in Chemtech and we see also a well-growing service business, and we will go into adjacent markets, which we don’t want to speak in detail now. But okay, whether they will help next year, first-half that I cannot say. So it’s a question of the portfolio and step-by-step portfolio shift towards higher margin. But you are right, we will have to compensate the larger sales next year in the energy and yes, Bio Energy exactly. We are not expecting a margin deterioration for next half-year. I mean, yes, for next half-year next H1 next year, so.
Christian Arnold
But yes, talking about particularly higher margin in slow equipment. So what target do you have in mind? I mean, being now at 7% having higher energy pumps or high importance of energy pumps are in there? And do you expect margin at 8%, 9%.
Suzanne Thoma
Don’t want to give a comment on the exact number now for the following reason. I mean, the margin is a question of pricing. We believe that particularly in Bio Energy, we can do some more on pricing. And it is a question of cost. And we know that we can do something in the area of cost. So you will see the development coming out of these initiatives, but it is too early to publicly give a target at this point in time.
Christian Arnold
Okay, thank you very much.
Suzanne Thoma
You’re welcome.
Operator
The next question comes from the line of Alessandro Foletti with Octavian. Please go ahead.
Alessandro Foletti
Yes. Good morning. Thank you for taking my questions. I was wondering first on the water business, which you mentioned was a slow decline. Thailand did not publish yet Q2, but last Q1 was really very, very strong and it’s not mistaken, already there doing a little bit better. Can you maybe explain me why Xylem doing better than — so.
Suzanne Thoma
Well, we cannot speak for Xylem. Of course, we have in water — can you give me the water figures.
Thomas Zickler
Yes, I can add on this. In water, we are on order intake for the first six months more or less flat. It is industry which is slightly 1.2% down. But in the water, we haven’t seen a big desalination project, which we normally would have taken in. But we are looking much more this year for the order intake margins — and let’s see if we get some in the second-half of this year. For the second-half of this year, talking about water, it looks much better, compared to the flattish situation in H1. But again, the flattish situation related to water in H1 was mainly related to having not a bigger desalination project taken into.
Alessandro Foletti
Right. And what drives this much better outlook in the second-half?
Thomas Zickler
It’s the market. Plus we are also working on the one or the other desalination project, a bit smaller ones, but more attractive ones.
Alessandro Foletti
Right. And I have another question on the strategic review or operational review I guess you will comment when you’re ready to give more information, but can you tell me if there is any cost associated with this operational review as far as I understand, this is sort of new information in a way that you are undergoing also an operational review.
Suzanne Thoma
Yes. When we started with the strategic review in January and went into really analyzing the situation at Sulzer, we did realize quite clearly that we have important potential also in what we are doing today in terms of operational excellence and of business excellence. We are not expecting at this point in time any major restructuring costs. For example, if this is your question. We are looking at doing what we do better and more efficiently and filling our plans without having to build new ones, for example, getting better commercial terms all of these kind of — I would almost say housekeeping things, but which are, of course, not done from one day to the other. But we are not at this point in time looking at major restructuring costs.
Alessandro Foletti
Alright. That’s great. One other question and then I have a comment, if I may, later on. On your balance sheet, you have CHF1.1 billion in cash and CHF1 billion of long-term debt. And I wonder if this is intentional and sort of necessary.
Thomas Zickler
Here, maybe Suzanne, I can answer.
Suzanne Thoma
Please.
Thomas Zickler
No, actually, it’s not a necessity for this and as you have realized in July — on July 6, we have already paid back CHF290 million bond Swiss bond, which matured out of our cash — and this is coming from the basically prior years where we prepared for bigger M&A, and we had a bit more cash on our side to be always ready for bigger M&A transactions. From the current perspective and also looking a bit into the strategy and what Suzanne said, it is not necessary that we have this huge amount of cash available in our balance sheet.
Alessandro Foletti
Alright. So if I interpret your answer properly, you might want to do acquisitions, but not things that eat up in one go, the full $1 billion.
Suzanne Thoma
You know, at this point of time, there is nothing that we see. If an opportunity comes, we may, but it’s definitely not our focus today, we want to be resilient in the way we run our company, and that rather speaks for — if at all, for smaller and stepwise acquisitions in adjacent market.
Alessandro Foletti
Yes, I have understood. Thank you very much. Maybe one last thing. I wanted to ask about the non-operational items as well. So maybe, please, if you — when you deliver your as if you can deliver to everybody, it would be helpful.
Thomas Zickler
Yes, I will do.
Operator
The next question comes from the line of Michael Roost with Baader-Helvea. Please go ahead.
Michael Roost
Yes. Hi, good morning. Actually I have two questions. One is just an add-on to the previous — 1 of the previous questions on the strategy update. I know you can’t give me an exact time line, but should we expect the strategy update this year still, number one?
And number two is the search for a new CEO. Is that going? Or are we — should — is that still on the back burner until the strategy update?
Suzanne Thoma
Yes. You can expect a strategy update towards the end of this year or early next year. That’s at least the plan for the — it depends also a bit on the results. Regarding CEO, we are not searching for a new CEO right now, we will continue with the current setup for the time being.
Michael Roost
Thank you.
Operator
[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from the line of Charlie [Indiscernible] with AWB. Please go ahead.
Unidentified Analyst
Hi, everybody. Good morning and thanks for taking my question. As I’ve seen — as you raised the guidance for the full-year, you hear me?
Thomas Zickler
Yes.
Suzanne Thoma
Yes, now better.
Unidentified Analyst
Can you hear me? Okay. Sorry. You raised the guidance for the full year, but still, I’d like to ask Don to see in any markets, any signs of an oncoming recession towards the end of the year? Thank you.
Suzanne Thoma
We do see certain small signs in our market, but nothing major. Maybe we see a little bit something in the chemical industry in Europe, which has an importance for our Chemtech division. But all in all, we are watching very closely — of course, we all know that the industry, particularly in Europe is in difficulties. It has so far not hit us, maybe also, because we are in projects which are aligned with changes in regulation with sustainability with these more structural changes in our customer industries. But of course, we are watching it very carefully, and it has also had an influence in the extent of our guidance adjustment.
Unidentified Analyst
Thank you.
Operator
Ladies and gentlemen, there are no more questions this time. This concludes today’s conference. Thank you very much for your participation. You may now disconnect your lines. Good-bye.
Thomas Zickler
Thank you very much.
Suzanne Thoma
Thank you very much. Good-bye.
Read the full article here